Adult Social Networking sites
- A Paper Bird
- An Anthology of English Pros
- Border Thinking on Migration, Trafficking and Commercial Sex
- Born Whore
- Bound Not Gagged
- Butter bei die Fische
- Choice Joyce
- Feminist Ire
- For The Love Of Porn, Prostitution and Pussy
- German Blog for Professionals
- happy endings? You Can’t Clap with One Hand
- Manahar’s Blog
- Modern Hooker
- Moron Watch- So You Don't Have To
- My Cora Pearl
- Myths of Sex Trafficking
- PEPFAR’s Violations of the Right to Health of Sex Workers
- Porn Valley
- Research Project Korea
- Sex Toys
- The Other Swedish Model
- This Old Whore House
- Tits and Sass
- Trade Secrets Guide
- Whore Madonna
- Berkeley Labor Center-UC
- Labor Center Evergreen State College Wa.
- San Francisco Citadel
- San Francisco Sex Information
- The Body Electric School of Massage
- The Desilets Method
Published by administrator | Filed under
http://johnnycalifornia.com/?p=1284San Francisco’s Prop K- How CNN Used a Phony Poll From a Sex Blog To Argue Against Prostitution Decrminalization Nov.07.08
Editor – I write in response to Debra J. Saunders’ column, “Pimps, pedophiles: Welcome to S.F.” (Aug. 17). Saunders criticized Proposition K on the San Francisco ballot for not addressing child prostitution, but this initiative is not about decriminalizing child prostitution, which would still be criminalized under laws prohibiting sex with minors. This initiative is about decriminalizing consensual sex acts in exchange for payment between adults.
If prostitution were decriminalized, child prostitution would still be a crime, but children could no longer be incarcerated as criminals, as they sometimes are under the criminalization of prostitution.
Furthermore, Saunders’ assertion that this initiative would hinder the prosecution of human-trafficking cases is false. This initiative would not end the prosecution of human-trafficking cases. What this initiative would do is prevent the city from using federal and state anti-trafficking funds to racially profile, arrest or deport sex workers. Under the criminalization of prostitution, sex workers are being arrested and deported under legislation that is supposed to be about stopping human trafficking. Persecuting sex workers does nothing to stop human trafficking.
Sex Workers Outreach Project Erotic Service Providers Union San Francisco
Letter to Editor
It’s human rights reform
Editor – I am one of the proponents of the measure to decriminalize prostitution, along with a number of legal experts. Mayor Gavin Newsom and District Attorney Kamala Harris are clearly misinformed about how the legislation will work.
What it will do is allow sex workers – paid or unpaid – to report crimes that occur without the fear of being prosecuted just for reporting abuses like robbery, rape and beatings. This reform also allows workers who are held against their will greater ability to report it than they have today. It will actually stem sex slavery. I think our elected officials need to think clearly about how to resolve society’s problems instead of reacting hysterically.
The measure should be looked at for what it truly is: a human rights reform that gives credibility to vulnerable workers and promotes law enforcement. What could be more productive than that?
Most prominently, as many of you know, Carol Leigh (aka Scarlet
Harlot) was on the Bill O’Reilly show. Unfortunately he did not give
her much time to address the issue, as she had to spend most of the
scant time he let her talk during the segment trying to counter his
insistence on regulation. Some of Carol’s facial expressions as she’s
listening to O’Reilly blather on are priceless!
The San Francisco Sentinel has a story on the measure that quotes
Maxine as quoted by the Chronicle. Interestingly, the picture with the story
depicts a young man on the street instead of a young woman for a change.
Annoyingly, they also provide a link to SAGE, and do not allow comments on
San Francisco Sentinel.com
A couple pieces in the libertarian blogosphere including from David
Weigel of Reason Magazine focus on my role in the measure. The
material isn’t accurate in every particular (guess that’s true for
most of the coverage we’ve gotten, come to think of it), but any
attention in places where the audience is likely to be supportive is
a good thing…
And a few more sightings of the AP wire story on the measure
qualifying that I don’t think made my last list, including in the SF
Examiner and USA Today…
Paying for sex is common. The U.S. should follow Mexico’s lead and accept that.
By Patty Kelly
March 13, 2008
Eliot Spitzer paid a woman for sex. And got caught. Depending on whose statistics you choose to believe, more than one in every 10 American adult males have paid for sex at some point in their lives. What’s more, in 2005, about 84,000 people were arrested across the nation for prostitution-related offenses.
In other words, it’s not terribly uncommon. It’s a part of our culture, and it’s not going away any time soon. Perhaps Spitzer’s resignation will help convince Americans that it is finally time to decriminalize prostitution across the country.
Recently, I spent a year working at a legal, state-regulated brothel in Mexico, a nation in which commercial sex is common, visible and, in one-third of the states, legal. I was not working as a prostitute but as an anthropologist, to study and analyze the place of commercial sex in the modern world. I spent my days and nights in close contact with the women who sold sexual services, with their clients and with government bureaucrats who ran the brothel.
Here’s what I learned: Most of the workers made some rational choice to be there, sometimes after a divorce, a bad breakup or an economic crisis, acute or chronic. Of the 140 women who worked at the Galactic Zone, as the brothel was called, only five had a pimp (and in each of those cases, they insisted the man was their boyfriend).
The women made their own hours, set their own rates and decided for themselves what sex acts they would perform. Some were happy with the job. (As Gabriela once told me: “You should have seen me before I started working here. I was so depressed.”) Others would’ve preferred to be doing other work, though the employment available to these women in Mexico (servants, factory workers) pays far less for longer hours.
At the Galactic Zone, good-looking clients were appreciated and sometimes resulted in boyfriends; the cheap, miserly and miserable ones were avoided, if possible.
To be sure, the brothel had its dangers: Sexually transmitted diseases and violence were occasionally a part of the picture. But overall, it was safer than the streets, due in part to police protection and condom distribution by government authorities.
Legalizing and regulating prostitution has its own problems — it stigmatizes sex workers (mostly by requiring them to register with the authorities), subjects them to mandatory medical testing that is not always effective, and gives clients and workers a false sense of security (with respect to sexual health and otherwise).
But criminalization is worse. Sweden’s 1998 criminalization of commercial sex — a measure titled “The Protection of Women” — appears not to protect them at all. A 2004 report by the Swedish Ministry of Justice and the police found that after it went into effect, prostitution, of course, continued. Meanwhile, prices for sexual services dropped, clients were fewer but more often violent, more wanted to pay for sex and not use a condom — and sex workers had less time to assess the mental state of their clients because of the fear of getting caught.
New Zealand’s 2003 Prostitution Reform Act is perhaps the most progressive response to the complex issue of prostitution. The act not only decriminalizes the practice but seeks to “safeguard the human rights of sex workers and protects them from exploitation, promotes the welfare and occupational health and safety of sex workers, is conducive to public health, [and] prohibits the use in prostitution of persons under 18 years of age.”
Furthermore, clients, sex workers and brothel owners bear equal responsibility for minimizing the risks of STD transmission. In 2005, a client was convicted of violating the act by slipping his condom off during sex.
And this brings me to clients. I have met hundreds of men who have paid for sex. Some seek any kind of sex; others want certain kinds of sex; a few look for comfort and conversation.
Saying that all sex workers are victims and all clients are demons is the easy way out. Perhaps it’s time to face this fact like adults (or at least like Mexico) — with a little less moralizing and a good deal more honesty.
As for Spitzer, if he had walked into the Galactic Zone, my questions would have been these: Was he respectful? Was he safe? Did he pay well? If the answer to all three was yes, then, well, I voted for him once, and I’d vote for him again.
Patty Kelly, an anthropology professor at George Washington University, is the author of “Lydia’s Open Door: Inside Mexico’s Most Modern Brothel,” due out in April.