|
|
|
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Protection Order in Jones vs Dejavu
Case 3:05-cv-00997 -BZ Document 52 Filed 05/04/2005 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 I KIMBERLY JONES, et al.,
12
Plaintiff(s) ,
No. C 05-0997 BZ
13
v.
SEALING AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 I DEJA VU, INC., et al.,
15
Defendant(s) .
16
17
Having reviewed plaintiffs' ex parte motion to seal 18
and for a protective order, the opposition, the reply, and 19
the declarations filed in support of plaintiffs' motion for 20 preliminary injunction that have been filed under seal, and 21
for the reasons discussed at the hearing, I find that at 22
this stage of the litigation, the need of Jane Roes 1-5 for 23
anonymity outweighs any prejudice to the opposing party and 24
the public's interest in knowing the identity of the Jane 25
Roe plaintiffs. See Does 1 Thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile 26
Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (9th Cir. 2000). I believe 27
there may be ways of managing this litigation such that the 28
1
Case 3:05-cv-00997 -BZ Document 52 Filed 05/04/2005 Page 2 of 2 1 I identities of the Roe plaintiffs may become less 2 I significant than in the usual litigation. I further 3 I believe there may be ways of disclosing the identity of the 4 I plaintiffs to less than all of the defendants' employees 5 I and agents while not prejudicing defendants ability to 6 I defend themselves. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 I 1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to seal the 8 I declarations and consents of the five Jane Roe plaintiffs 9 I filed in this case, 10 I 2) Pending further order, the declarations, consents 11 I and identities of Jane Roes 1-5 shall be disclosed only to 12 I Edith A. Thomas, Michael B. Margolis, Laura M. Toutant, and 13 I Douglas J. Melton, and may not be shared, disseminated or 14 otherwise disclosed to any other individual or entity, 15 I including employees or agents of any defendant, and 16 I 3) Plaintiffs' counsel shall serve forthwith a copy of 17 I the sealed declarations filed in support of plaintiffs' 18 I motion for a preliminary injunction on the attorneys 19 I specified in this order. 20 I 4) A status conference is scheduled for May 23, 2005 21 I at 3:00 p.m. to consider the case management ideas 22 I discussed during the hearing. Each party shall file and 23 I serve a case management proposal by May 20, 2005. 24 I Dated: May 4, 2005 25 /s/ Bernard Zimmerman Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\DEJA VU\PROTECTlVE.ORD.wpd 2

|

|